Truth in Fiction: Laura Ingalls Wilder and Rose Wilder Lane
What’s the truth in a work of fiction? In a recent piece for Teen Reads http://www.teenreads.com/blog/2009/08/j o-knowles-did-it-happen-to-you.asp, Jo Knowles
jbknowles covers the origins of her novels in lived experience, and the ways her struggle to understand people she’s known, including herself, shapes the lives she creates in novels. There’s truth and imagination, which is so much composed of compassion. Jo says it all brilliantly. When readers ask novelists – is this, or any of this true? – some bristle, taking the question as an assault upon their creativity, Kind Jo puts front and center the question that’s so often behind the question: am I alone? So many of us read to feel we aren’t, and are comforted when we read of someone who seems to understand us. We may come to an author hoping that is not an illusion. While honoring the complexity of the creative process, Jo assures us that we’re not forever bound to be misfits.
Relating to truth but from a different angle, I just read a New Yorker http://www.newyorker.com/arts/ article by Judith Thurman, who often and deftly profiles remarkable women for this magazine. This one is about Laura Ingalls Wilder and her daughter Rose Wilder Lane. Judith Thurman’s focus is on their relationship, particularly their collaboration as writers, which seems to be mainly Laura providing the material of stories from her hard, brave life, while Rose, who’d already had a long career as a writer, shaped them into the books that would become beloved. Upon hearing of the daughter’s hand in the stories, some feel betrayed. They thought they were all truth. There are still debates about whether the books should be shelved with fiction or nonfiction. Because of the heavy reliance on dialogue and scenes which Laura surely could not remember looking back over fifty years, even before looking at early manuscripts, I considered them fiction based on fact. It’s a twist on the James Frey fiasco: he wrote a novel that his publisher apparently decided would sell better as memoir; it sold fantastically well, at which point much of what he wrote was revealed as not just wild conjecture but lies. I haven’t followed this well, but I believe the book is now being published as fiction.
It’s a long way from tales of addiction and jail stays to the Little Houses, but there’s the same cry in the heart to believe we’re not alone. And also, that ancient perhaps not as pretty cry to feel somebody’s got it worse. Hey I’m not THAT addicted and I may have done a foolish thing or two but I never landed in jail. OR, hey, a job was lost in the family and the weather’s bad, but that winter storm didn’t drop snow seventeen feet high, and we didn’t almost starve because the train didn’t get through. We’ve got problems, but no blights of locusts, hail, drought, or bears lurking outside thin walls.
Stories in the media often pose the moment of revelation, when you find something you thought was true was not, as moments of drama, anger, sheer and cold betrayal. But often I’ve found those moments to be gentle and hushed; the truth falls, and it brings people quietly closer, perhaps after some anguish. In Borrowed Names, my book of poems coming out next spring, I wrote of Laura and Rose and how they worked together; not scheming to keep secrets, but a mother and daughter collaborating at last as best they knew how with pencils, five cent notebooks, and a typewriter, trying to tell a story of hope.
Relating to truth but from a different angle, I just read a New Yorker http://www.newyorker.com/arts/ article by Judith Thurman, who often and deftly profiles remarkable women for this magazine. This one is about Laura Ingalls Wilder and her daughter Rose Wilder Lane. Judith Thurman’s focus is on their relationship, particularly their collaboration as writers, which seems to be mainly Laura providing the material of stories from her hard, brave life, while Rose, who’d already had a long career as a writer, shaped them into the books that would become beloved. Upon hearing of the daughter’s hand in the stories, some feel betrayed. They thought they were all truth. There are still debates about whether the books should be shelved with fiction or nonfiction. Because of the heavy reliance on dialogue and scenes which Laura surely could not remember looking back over fifty years, even before looking at early manuscripts, I considered them fiction based on fact. It’s a twist on the James Frey fiasco: he wrote a novel that his publisher apparently decided would sell better as memoir; it sold fantastically well, at which point much of what he wrote was revealed as not just wild conjecture but lies. I haven’t followed this well, but I believe the book is now being published as fiction.
It’s a long way from tales of addiction and jail stays to the Little Houses, but there’s the same cry in the heart to believe we’re not alone. And also, that ancient perhaps not as pretty cry to feel somebody’s got it worse. Hey I’m not THAT addicted and I may have done a foolish thing or two but I never landed in jail. OR, hey, a job was lost in the family and the weather’s bad, but that winter storm didn’t drop snow seventeen feet high, and we didn’t almost starve because the train didn’t get through. We’ve got problems, but no blights of locusts, hail, drought, or bears lurking outside thin walls.
Stories in the media often pose the moment of revelation, when you find something you thought was true was not, as moments of drama, anger, sheer and cold betrayal. But often I’ve found those moments to be gentle and hushed; the truth falls, and it brings people quietly closer, perhaps after some anguish. In Borrowed Names, my book of poems coming out next spring, I wrote of Laura and Rose and how they worked together; not scheming to keep secrets, but a mother and daughter collaborating at last as best they knew how with pencils, five cent notebooks, and a typewriter, trying to tell a story of hope.
